Topic:Social media is a perfect environment to promote appearance concerns and eatingdisorders.It has long been known that exposure to traditional types of media, such as magazines, movies, and television, can increase body image concerns in youths (Tiggermann & McGill, 2004; Tiggermann & Polivy, 2010). Given that young people are now turning to Internet sources rather than print media, the potential impact of social media on body confidence should not be overlooked. In this essay, I would argue that social media has a negative influence on body image concerns and can lead to detrimental consequences.  Much research has indicated that mass mediais considered the most influential and pervasive cause of body dissatisfaction(Thompson, Heingberg, Altabe, & Tantleff-Dunn, 1999; Tiggermann, 2011).Internalisation of ‘body perfect’ ideas and the stereotypes about body sizebegins when girls are as young as 3 years-old. It begins with baby girls’exposure to mass communicated images of Barbie dolls, then moves to televisionadvertisements and programs that celebrate ultra-thin models. It thenculminates in early adulthood with appearance-focused conversations,fashion-focused stories, and picture-sharing on social networking websites. Thesefactors have been found to promote unattainable beauty ideals of oftenphoto-shopped women who are usually young, have a perfect body ratio and areincredibly thin. Although traditional media are still widely consumed, newforms of media or the Internet are being increasingly accessed. As of June2017, approximately 52% of the world’s population has access to the Internet(Internet World Stats, 2017). Recent studies show that, as in traditionalmedia, there are many places on the Internet that promote the stereotypicalideals of feminine beauty. For example, an analysis of advertisements aimed atadolescents on the Internet indicates that most figures used in theadvertisements were young, thin, and attractive females (Slater, Tiggermann,Hawkins, & Werchon, 2011). Additionally, Tiggermann and her co-researchersfound that Internet usage was related to greater internalization of thin-ideal,appearance comparison, body dissatisfaction, and the drive for thinness(Tiggermann & Miller, 2010). Associated with the rise of the Internet areSocial Networking Sites (SNSs). As of June 2017, there are 2.46 billion socialmedia users around the globe, and 71 percent of internet users were also socialnetwork users (Statista, 2017). Social media sites differ from the traditionalmass media in several ways. First of all, a large proportion of socialnetworking sites are peer-generated, which means users are simultaneouslyinformation sources and receivers. Second, by affording users the ability toshape, customise and direct online interactions, contemporary media transformswhat were once passive receivers of the formerly popular mass media, intofull-fledged communicators, with self-efficacy, and personal agency. Third,social media are more personal than conventional impersonal mass media. Userscan bond with each other using technology, and content can revolve around theself. Fourth, social media are interpersonally rich tools that offer graphicsapps, videos, and transformative multi-media cues that give the feeling ofpresence, lending the opportunity to transport individuals to psychologicallyinvolving domains that can encourage suspension of belief and attitude change.Finally, while mass media has a large heterogeneous audience, social mediasites cater to communities of individuals with the same interests, ideas, andopinions. They are fundamentally media of one’s peers. An amount of research on sociocultural factors and body image has emphasised the role of social comparisons in explaining media effects on body image concerns (Thompson et al. 1999). According to social comparison theory, people find it diagnostic and functional to compare themselves to others, especially to those who have similar attributes that are central to their definition of self. This has important implications for the effects of social media. Aforementioned, social media are the domain of peers, and peer comparisons are greatly salient to adolescents. In addition, upward social comparisons with attractive peers can actually lead to more negative self-attractiveness ratings than comparisons with attractive models in advertisements, who are less similar and in a less diagnostic comparison group. Social media are full of pictures of peers and create a favourable environment for social comparisons. Negative comparisons can be particularly likely on social media when young women compare their pictures with peers without knowing that those photographs might be digitally edited. More specifically, one experimental study indicates that upward social comparison can occur with social media profiles. Both male and female participants reported negative emotional states and showed some signs of body dissatisfaction when they viewed profiles with physically attractive photographs, meanwhile, those who viewed unattractive users’ profile pictures reported less negative emotional states (Hafekamp & Krãmer, 2011). Previous studies show that exposure to peerswho closely match the thin ideal has been found to increase bodydissatisfaction in women (Krones, Stice, Batres, & Orjada, 2005). It is alsointeresting to note that comparisons to peers and models can lead to differentresults in regard to women’s body image concerns. The reason is the appearanceof peers seems to be more realistic and attainable than the appearance ofmodels or celebrities because peers often have the same resources and lifestyleto oneself. In addition, in social media contexts, peers are not the onlytargets of social comparisons but online models or celebrities are as well.Beautiful pictures of models and celebrities are shared and posted on manysocial platforms such as Facebook, Instagram or Twitter. They are usuallyairbrushed to remove any flaws and this, in combination with the efforts ofprofessional staff (such as hairstylist, make-up artists, photographers, etc) ensuresthat there is a huge gap between what is thought of beautiful and what can beattainable. We are aspiring to an ideal that does not exist, when constantlyexposed to images of unrealistic men and women that have been digitallyconstructed.  When we look at the negative influences ofsocial media on body image concerns, exposure is not the only factor, we alsoneed to look at the ways in which social media is used. Using social networkingsites is far different than passive exposure to traditional mass media. It isan interactive process, users are capable of creating and presenting their ownmedia content while also viewing content created by others. A classicperspective of mass communication is uses and gratifications. It indicates thatindividuals use media to satisfy needs, seeking gratifications to fulfilmotives and deriving gratifications from media use that can be bothpsychologically functional or dysfunctional (Rubin 2009). When applied tosocial media and body image concern, it suggests that individuals who arevulnerable to body image disturbances will seek gratification from socialmedia. Young people who have low self-esteem and high thin-idealinternalisation are likely to seek gratification from social media. They maycheck their profile pictures online to satisfy reassurance needs, spending aconsiderable amount of time looking and comparing their pictures to those oftheir less attractive peers to validate their appearance, or sharing picturesof celebrities and models to ritualistically escape appearance-related personaldistress. By doing this, they try to satisfy psychologicalappearance-gratifying needs and convince themselves they fit the thin-ideal ofothers. Eventually, young people usually end up feeling disappointed and hurt becausethe ultimate satisfaction of these needs cannot come from external sources butcan only be found internally. Social media also unabashedly promote anorexic and bulimic lifestyles through a lot of pro-anorexia or pro-ana and pro-bulimia (pro-mia) Websites (Levine and Chapman 2011). Nowadays, there are many websites that devoted to promoting pro-anorexic ideals. They usually contain positive represent of an anorexic lifestyle; religiously-based metaphors; and more than 10 core themes, for example, perfection (the norms linking thinness with perfection), transformation (eating disorders can transform a person from ‘ugly’ and ‘fat’ to ‘thin’ and ‘beautiful’), and success (the association of success with strength and ability to keep the weight off). In addition, Healthy Living blogs promote the image of thin appearance and deliver disordered nutritional messages, and also containing self-objectifying messages about women (Boepple and Thompson 2013). Two experiments indicate that exposure to pro-ana Websites exerts a number of negative influences, such as lower self-esteem, and decreased perceived attractiveness of oneself (Bardone-Cone and Cass 2007). Pro-mia Websites can also have harmful effects for young women (Levine and Chapman 2011).In conclusion, traditional media has long been known for its negative influence on body image concerns and behaviours through the promotion of ‘body perfect’ ideals, but there are far fewer studies on the detrimental impacts of social media. In this essay, I argue that social media provides a perfect environment for negative social comparisons and gratification that could lead to appearance concerns and eating disorders amongst users.ReferencesBardone-Cone, A. M., & Cass, K. M. (2007). What does viewing a proanorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 537–548. doi:10.1002/eatBoepple, L., & Thompson, J. K. (2013). A content analysis of healthy living blogs: Evidence of content thematically consistent with dysfunctional eating attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47, 362–367. doi:10.1002/eat.22244.Dittmar, H., Halliwell, E., & Ive, S. (2006). Does Barbie make girls want to be thin? The effect of experimental exposure to images of dolls on the body image of 5–8-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 42, 283-292.Dittmar, H. (2009). How Do “BodyPerfect” Ideals in the Media Have a Negative Impact on Body Image andBehaviors? Factors and Processes Related to Self and Identity. Journal ofSocial and Clinical Psychology, 28(1), 1-8. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.1Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C.,Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on socialmedia: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. BodyImage,13(SupplementC), 38-45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002Ferguson, C. J., Muñoz, M. E.,Garza, A., & Galindo, M. (2014). Concurrent and Prospective Analyses ofPeer, Television and Social Media Influences on Body Dissatisfaction, EatingDisorder Symptoms and Life Satisfaction in Adolescent Girls. Journal of Youthand Adolescence, 43(1), 1-14. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9898-9Haferkamp, N., & Kramer, N.C. (2011). Social comparison 2.0: examining the effects of online profiles onsocial-networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 14(5), 309-314.doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0120Internet World Stats (2017). World Internet Users Statistics and 2017 World Population Stats. Retrieved: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htmKim, J. W., & Chock, T. M.(2015). Body image 2.0: Associations between social grooming on Facebook andbody image concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 48(Supplement C),331-339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.009Krones, P. G., Stice, E.,Batres, C., & Orjada, K. (2005). In vivo social comparison to a thin-idealpeer promotes body dissatisfaction: a randomized experiment. Int J EatDisord, 38(2), 134-142. doi:10.1002/eat.20171Levine, M. P., & Chapman, K. (2011). Media influences on body image. In T. F. Cash & L. Smolak (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and   prevention (2nd ed., pp. 101–109). New York: Guilford Press.Perloff, R. M. (2014). SocialMedia Effects on Young Women’s Body Image Concerns: Theoretical Perspectivesand an Agenda for Research. Sex Roles, 71(11), 363-377.doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0384-6Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In J. Bryant    & M.   B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 165–184). New York: Routledge. Slater, A., Tiggemann, M.,Hawkins, K., & Werchon, D. (2011). Just One Click: A Content Analysis ofAdvertisements on Teen Web Sites. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(4),339-345. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.003Statista (2017). Number of social media users worldwide 2010-2021. Retrieved 30/10/17 from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological AssociationTiggemann, M. (2011). Sociocultural perspectives on human appearance and body image. In T. F. Cash & L. Smolak (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention (2nd ed., pp. 12–19). New York: Guilford PressTiggemann, M., Polivy, J., & Hargreaves, D. (2009). The processing of thin ideals in fashion magazines: A source of social comparison or fantasy? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 73-93.Tiggemann, M., & McGill, B.(2004). The Role of Social Comparison in the Effect of Magazine Advertisementson Women’s Mood and Body Dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and ClinicalPsychology, 23(1), 23-44. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.1.23.26991Get Help With Your EssayIf you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!Find out more