Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away
We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

Nike SWOT Analysis and Supply Chain Management

Nike SWOT Analysis and Supply Chain Management

Introduction Nike Corporationstarted in 1955 as a shoe distributor but has grown into a multi-productinternationally with the company having a major global dominance in the market.Although with success, Nike has had its share of problems and challenges alongthe way. Nike through this still remains the biggest manufacturer worldwide ofboth athletic footwear and apparel in terms of sales. Nike operates in US,Europe, Middle East and Africa. It has manufacturing bases and operationsthroughout Asia. SWOT Analysis of Nike(S)trengthsBranding: One particular strength of Nike is that it has become a competitive organisation through the use of branding and has created an competitive approach from this. The slogan ‘Just Do it’ epitomizes its attitude towards its business. Outsourcing: Strength of Nike is that it has outsourced all functions of production to overseas facilities and therefore by doing this doesn’t have any manufacturing outlet of its own. This has helped the company obtain a higher value through the adding activities like design, research and development. Nike’s targeting is a very distinct way that they are able to gain advantage in the market. Nike gets top athletes like LeBron James, Tiger Woods to wear and sponsor their products rather than events or competitions. [1]From this people tend to remember the brand worn by the players and not the brand that sponsors the events that the players perform at. Customer satisfaction: Nike invests a lot in product research and development in order to offer better sports apparels to customers. Strength of Nike is that it has a consistent level of growth each year with 2011-2014 with expected forecasts showing that it will continue to grow 7% every year.  By continuing to grow, this is strength of Nike given that the market has been experiencing a slowdown in sales growth. (W)eaknessesThe market that Nike participates in is very price sensitive. Most of Nike’s income comes from the selling of its products to retailers. This usually shows that margins tend to get squeezed as retailers try to get low price competition on Nike’s products. [2]The income of the business is still heavily dependent upon its share of the footwear market which may leave it vulnerable if for any reason its market share erodes Even though Nike is outsourcing its manufacturing aspects which is seen as an strength, this can create negative publicity because of poor labour conditions in overseas outlets. The poor pay and work conditions deem the term ‘sweatshop’. Nike has the image of being too ‘premium’ and a ‘luxury brand’ which can be seen not a negative thing but the current market situation with consumers migrating to the middle tier of luxury scale as they are being price conscious and quality focused could mean that Nike has to put out an extra effort to draw consumers inThe company focuses on retailers who stock other brands which can be a bad thing as they are not spreading out their products to exclusive retailer outlets. (O)pportunitiesThe technology is always changing in the retail market as well as the sporting market giving Nike opportunities for innovation.Nike is rooted by culture especially with youth culture as Nike is seen as a fashion brand and youth in particular view Nike as a must own brand. This creates its own opportunities.Nike has the opportunity to develop products such as sport wear, sunglasses and jewellery with such items possess high profit.(T)hreats With theinternational nature of trade involving buying and selling in differentcurrencies which means that the costs and margins are not stable over longperiods of time this would mean that such a level of exposure could mean Nikemay be manufacturing or selling at a loss. The retailsector being price competitive could mean that consumers are shopping aroundfor a better deal, for Nike this could mean fluctuations in sales. Nike hasto commit to a continuation of improving on its image where it has to resort toexploitative business practices in its overseas outlets. Nike would be forcedto pay a heavy price as the emerging consumers are socially conscious whichmeans that they would not like to buy the product of which a company ispracticing bad business practices.Given thatNike has a global supply chain can mean that it can be subject to a change ofcircumstances of international trade practices including labour strikes in itsoverseas locations, currency fluctuations which would lead to a decrease inprofit margins disrupting the global supply chain. Identification of main elements of a new strategyBased on the Swotanalysis that I have listed, Nike should be doing more towards concernsregarding competition, labour practices and customer service.  Given that Nike has the strength ofoutsourcing all of its functions overseas this was also seen as a weaknessbecause there was the problem in the 1990s with Nike getting in apparel toretailers by the due date. This was due to long order lead times and unreliablesupplies. This form of weakness can lead to a threat in particular as Nikewould be essentially causing stock-out for retailers as the retailers would beunable to sell their products on time. What Nike should have done is create arelationship more closely with the manufacturer and the retailer, in otherwords close-collaboration. Although on the other hand Nike had such strength inbrand that they were able to impose this in many cases as retailers had toagree to place future orders in order to obtain replenishes. The role of systems thinking in this strategyIn terms of the roleof systems thinking in a strategy essentially means having a systemic supplychain which monitors the mechanism in which can help address the worstpractices as well as providing a greater transparency. In this particular case,Nike’s supply chain in the 1990s was very fragmented as they had no control ofthe inventory since it had too many suppliers, the company initially focused onoutsourcing production rather than hosting any manufacturing plants. Nike havetried making it more of a collective identity by moving towards establishinglong term relationships with fewer factories as trusted partners. Nike’s systemwasn’t coordinated as there was a case where customers being the inputs for asystem who had placed an order in advance but the goods weren’t available instock by the agreed shipment date, this led to the problem where  customers weren’t able to receive coordinatedsocks, pants and sweatshirts in alongside for example a Jordan basketball shoe.The role of the Four Fundamentals of supply chain management in this strategy Fundamental one: Nike’s SCM objectives are to ensure that they are consulting with, coaching and building capacity with contract factories to optimize labor and environmental capabilities. They aim to manage sourcing through a balanced approach by taking into account environmental, social and cost impacts. They finally aim to offer suppliers real procurement opportunities as they arise. Fundamental two: Supply chain integration is the close alignment and coordination within a supply chain with the use of shared management information system. [3] Nike was fragmented in terms of its supply chain based on 1) there were difficulties in keeping collections together as if a retailer wished to specify some special collection of their own then this would be impossible. Fundamental three: moving Nike’s supply chain from being fragmented to being more integrated In consideration for Nike, there supply chain was seen as fragmented as they were getting problems in getting apparel to the retailer by the due date partly due to unreliable suppliers so in order for this problem to be integrated, Nike would have to create vertical integration in which the operations they are doing has an element of a presence in every segment from manufacturing down to sales. This ensures that the firms operating for Nike have a close relationship.  Nike also had a lack of information available to local management about the expected arrival date of shipments. In order to make this more integrated Nike should select specific vendors to provide specific inputs and develop an agreement to provide a set amount of inputs at a set cost. This ensures the company has a set amount of shipments that they will be collecting. Considering that in the 1990s, technology was very primitive, if Nike were to enhance the efficiency of the supply they could have used an ERP system (Enterprise Resource Planning) which is the integrated management of core business processes. This integration would have given Nike more control over the production process and better control of information which would have allowed them to relay information from the manufacturer to the retailor more quickly. Fundamental four: SCM not just about technology but it’s about people and the relationship. In particular a collaborative relationship produces innovation as by holding supplier relationships raises the level of procurement and ensures that products are delivered efficiently within the supply chain. A successful relationship between customers and suppliers allows a connection in ways in which they can easily exchange information, demand date and visibility of status. One example would be working together to reduce costs and quality. Consideration of specific logistics and transportation challenges, as well as the potential role of technology in addressing themThe challenges forsupply chain and logistics are that there is a change in customers who nowadayshave more information available to them than before and can create fluctuationsin demand leading to prices being changed. For a particular large product, customers would demand that at a lowerprice due to the vastness of information. In order to address the problem ofcustomer service expectations, a company would perhaps need to use social mediain a way in which informs the customers about products, informs them of pricediscounts and gets them turned in towards buying their products.  Interlinking with the supply chain, socialmedia creates open communication which creates more visibility for them andreduces operational costs of the supply chain while improving productivity.Another challengefor transportation is the skills shortage especially in the UK as there are notenough drivers and engineers to the sector this means that there would be adelay or reduction in the numbers of products circling the supply chain whichmeans that companies can’t sell their products as quickly as possible. Likewith the previous solution, using social media and advertising apprenticeshipsfor drivers or in the manufacturing sector would help. Furthermore thereis the threat of globalisation in which companies are trying to reduce theirsupply chain cost and in order to please their customers’ price expectations,companies have planned to relocate manufacturing to low cost countries aroundthe world in an effort to reduce costs and minimize taxes. Generally havingglobal supplier’s means that delivery times are extended which then leads tocustomers not having their products on time. A way to solve this withtechnology is by using PO management in which streamlines the supply chainmaking you be able to hold suppliers accountable for delayed or missed orderswhich then can ensure efficiency with the flow of products within the supplychain.In conclusion Nikehas generally from a fragmented stage during the 1990s to a more integratedstage nowadays with the addition of goals and newer technology enabling them toimprove the supply chain management as well as attain their global brand image.Perhaps what Nike needs to do now is ensure that they can improve labor practicesfor manufacturing bases in Asia to retain reputation and ensure that they cansmoothly process products from there to Europe.[1] Hossain, K. (2013, November 23). Nike competitive analysis. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/KhalidHossain/nike-competitive-analysis-28592151[2] Hossain, K. (2013, November 23). Nike competitive analysis. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/KhalidHossain/nike-competitive-analysis-28592151[3] C, Woods http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-supply-chain-integration-definition-lesson-quiz.htmlGet Help With Your EssayIf you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!Find out more

Order Solution Now