EVERYONE READ THIS! (graded)CLICK THE LINE ABOVE TO BEGIN RESPONDING TO THIS WEEK’S DISCUSSION QUESTIONS.In no particular order, WEEK 6 presenters are:HEIDI, NICOLE B, REGINA, ROMAIN, STEVE, & STEVEN.Do not put pressure on yourself to be perfect for nothing is. Just believe in yourself and have fun! Last minute changes to ppt slides must be completedbeforeclass begins. No more than five ppt slides and 20 mins presentation time (this includes Q&A).As a sign of respect to your fellow hardworking classmates EVERYONE please be on time at 9:30am sharp and ready to rock! Class participation is mandatory not optional. This next statement will sound harsh but it must be said. Please do not insult us by coming in egregiously late like a few of you do every week for it is rude, disrespectful, embarrassing, unprofessional, and lastly distracting. Keller pushed the class start time back to accommodate you and some of you are consistently and incredibly flippant of that.Presenters feel free to share and discuss anything you want. You are free to conduct an actual negotiation OR share a negotiation topic that has already played out. Remember, there is entirely too much information to fit into all the slides so you save it and incorporate it into your written assignment. In your oral presentation and Negotiation Analysis paper you must discuss the following. See your syllabus for further instruction and view doc sharing for my mock oral ppt slide presentation for a visual perspective.These are the REQUIRED HEADINGS and DISCUSSION BULLETS of your ppt slides. Combine them to no more than five slides max. Post your ppt slides below so as to not waste time with flash drives and logging into your email account. NEGOTIATION TOPIC BACKGROUND GOALS & OBJECTIVES DISTRIBUTIVE & INTEGRATIVE REASONING (ch. 2, 3, 4) COMMUNICATION FACTORS, MODEL, & PERCEPTUAL DISTORTIONS (ch. 7, 14, 15) CONFLICT RESOLUTION & MODEL (ch. 1, 17, 18, 19) SOCIAL CONTEXT & EXTERNAL PRESSURES (ch. 10, 11, 12, 13) POWER & ETHICS (ch. 5 & 8) BEST PRACTICE (ch. 20)BAGELS SERVED. BRING YOUR OWN DRINK.diss 2GAIN, DO NOT DEFINE ANYTHING! SHARE EXAMPLES ONLY!Scenario Summary:A supervisor in a large accounting firm is scheduled to interview a job candidate who comes highly recommended and has excellent qualifications. Jim has an accounting degree (bachelors) from a prestigious Ivy League school and has been working on his MBA by attending an online program for the last 18 months and is close to earning his degree. In addition he has been working for one of your competitors for several years and has excellent references attesting to his ability. Your payroll budget has recently been reduced significantly as a result of a declining client base and your manager has the final authority in establishing salaries for the new hires but generally is responsive to what his supervisors propose to a job candidate. In addition, the HR Director has published salary ranges for new hires that are to be adhered to, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as the candidate having special expertise, the ability to bring in additional clients, or excellent credentials including having the CPA certification.Your Role/Assignment:Your role is to determine whether distributive or integrative negotiations will be preferred in this scenario between the job applicant and the supervisor, and respond to the questions regarding the other parties who have an interest in hiring the job applicant. You must apply course concepts in your answers.1. What is the appropriate negotiation strategy that would be most advantageous for Sharon and Jim in this scenario, distributive or integrative bargaining? List and describe the factors that should be considered in making this determination? Personally speaking, how would you handle?2. What are HRs interests in this scenario, and what would be the potential negotiation strategy between the Accounting Manager and HR assuming that there is a decision that the published salary range for attracting Jim will have to be exceeded in order to hire him? Do you agree or disagree? Explain.CLICK THE LINE ABOVE TO BEGIN RESPONDING TO THIS WEEK’S DISCUSSION QUESTIONS.In no particular order, WEEK 6 presenters are:HEIDI, NICOLE B, REGINA, ROMAIN, STEVE, & STEVEN.Do not put pressure on yourself to be perfect for nothing is. Just believe in yourself and have fun! Last minute changes to ppt slides must be completedbeforeclass begins. No more than five ppt slides and 20 mins presentation time (this includes Q&A).As a sign of respect to your fellow hardworking classmates EVERYONE please be on time at 9:30am sharp and ready to rock! Class participation is mandatory not optional. This next statement will sound harsh but it must be said. Please do not insult us by coming in egregiously late like a few of you do every week for it is rude, disrespectful, embarrassing, unprofessional, and lastly distracting. Keller pushed the class start time back to accommodate you and some of you are consistently and incredibly flippant of that.Presenters feel free to share and discuss anything you want. You are free to conduct an actual negotiation OR share a negotiation topic that has already played out. Remember, there is entirely too much information to fit into all the slides so you save it and incorporate it into your written assignment. In your oral presentation and Negotiation Analysis paper you must discuss the following. See your syllabus for further instruction and view doc sharing for my mock oral ppt slide presentation for a visual perspective.These are the REQUIRED HEADINGS and DISCUSSION BULLETS of your ppt slides. Combine them to no more than five slides max. Post your ppt slides below so as to not waste time with flash drives and logging into your email account. NEGOTIATION TOPIC BACKGROUND GOALS & OBJECTIVES DISTRIBUTIVE & INTEGRATIVE REASONING (ch. 2, 3, 4) COMMUNICATION FACTORS, MODEL, & PERCEPTUAL DISTORTIONS (ch. 7, 14, 15) CONFLICT RESOLUTION & MODEL (ch. 1, 17, 18, 19) SOCIAL CONTEXT & EXTERNAL PRESSURES (ch. 10, 11, 12, 13) POWER & ETHICS (ch. 5 & 8) BEST PRACTICE (ch. 20)BAGELS SERVED. BRING YOUR OWN DRINK.diss 2GAIN, DO NOT DEFINE ANYTHING! SHARE EXAMPLES ONLY!Scenario Summary:A supervisor in a large accounting firm is scheduled to interview a job candidate who comes highly recommended and has excellent qualifications. Jim has an accounting degree (bachelors) from a prestigious Ivy League school and has been working on his MBA by attending an online program for the last 18 months and is close to earning his degree. In addition he has been working for one of your competitors for several years and has excellent references attesting to his ability. Your payroll budget has recently been reduced significantly as a result of a declining client base and your manager has the final authority in establishing salaries for the new hires but generally is responsive to what his supervisors propose to a job candidate. In addition, the HR Director has published salary ranges for new hires that are to be adhered to, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as the candidate having special expertise, the ability to bring in additional clients, or excellent credentials including having the CPA certification.Your Role/Assignment:Your role is to determine whether distributive or integrative negotiations will be preferred in this scenario between the job applicant and the supervisor, and respond to the questions regarding the other parties who have an interest in hiring the job applicant. You must apply course concepts in your answers.1. What is the appropriate negotiation strategy that would be most advantageous for Sharon and Jim in this scenario, distributive or integrative bargaining? List and describe the factors that should be considered in making this determination? Personally speaking, how would you handle?2. What are HRs interests in this scenario, and what would be the potential negotiation strategy between the Accounting Manager and HR assuming that there is a decision that the published salary range for attracting Jim will have to be exceeded in order to hire him? Do you agree or disagree? Explain.
